Religion, Worldviews and Multi-disciplinary Lenses

No change in change

I’ve been a religious studies practitioner for over two decades. Nearing three, if truth be told. And those years have seen much change in the context of the subject, with much to be excited about. Each change seems to have reinvigorated my passion for the subject and, I hope, lead to me being a more effective classroom teacher and subject lead.

When the 2018 Commission on Religious Education provided a new framing of the subject – as “Religion & Worldviews” rather than Religion – it was accompanied by a fresh wave of informed conversation that will have lasting impact on the subject and the pupils who are studying it.

And this conversation has a number of important new terms in it, terms that those participating in it need to be clear about. What is a ‘worldview’ and what sets it apart from a ‘religion’? What is ‘religious literacy’? And quite how many ‘multidisciplinary lenses’ are there?

A worldview

The report describes a worldview as ‘a person’s way of understanding, experiencing and responding to the world … as a philosophy of life or an approach to life’. (CofRE P8) Whilst this definition could cover the six principle religions of the United Kingdom (although I know this is contested), it does allow an individual who considers themselves not to be ‘religious’ to use terminology that places value and coherence upon their specific framework. And it allows others to place value upon it too.

No longer is a considerable proportion of our population defined by a negative – ‘not-religious’ or ‘not believing in God’ – but instead acknowledged as being a community drawn together by shared values and beliefs.

Multi-disciplinary Lenses

However many you might consider there to be, ‘multi-disciplinary lenses’ refers to using different academic disciplines or approaches or methodologies to study an aspect of a worldview. In Norfolk, the latest Locally Agreed Syllabus (Norfolk Agreed Syllabus 2019, P5) has settled on three – theology, philosophy and human/social sciences. In practical terms this might mean approaching the topic of pilgrimage by asking three different questions; “what does this pilgrimage teach the pilgrims about their deity?” (theology – thinking about and thinking through believing), “is it right that one place is more significant than another?” (philosophy – thinking about and thinking through thinking) and “what significant acts do the pilgrims carry out?” (human/social sciences – thinking about and thinking through living).

Serving religious literacy

No term has done more to reinvigorate my passion for RE than ‘religious literacy’.

The Norfolk Locally Agreed Syllabus defines religious literacy is ‘how well pupils are able to hold balanced and well-informed conversations about religion and worldviews.’ (P5) It advocates equipping the pupils to go beyond – whilst still embracing – personal reflection and academic excellence, becoming significant, independent, participants in the world in which they find themselves.

And in order to hold these ‘balanced and well-informed conversations’ with the wide-ranging worldviews they will encounter our pupils must engage with the unique beliefs, wrestle with the unique questions and negotiate the unique expressions of each. They will bring the lenses to bear on the worldviews in their journey to religious literacy.

And after nearly three decades, I’m still excited to be on the journey too.