Empowering Primary RE Leaders: Why Expertise Matters in Curriculum Design and Leadership

As a primary teacher who has taught in schools for nearly twenty years, I have had many opportunities to get involved in the wider world of education and leadership. I remember that at the start of my teaching career, my headteacher asked me if I had a plan and I told her that I just wanted to teach. This is something that has remained with me throughout my career. I firmly believe that to support other teachers and train the teachers of the future, we must be firmly rooted in our own classroom practice.

At the end of my NQT year (yes I am that old), I remember being asked to lead RE. I was aware that this role was a ‘beginning of the teaching career’ leadership role, one that would be mine for a bit and that I would then pass on as I became more experienced (but this was not true for me!). Over the last few years, I have increasingly wondered why this is something that is expected by the teaching profession when our subject with its complicated legal position, intricate pedagogy and sensitive nature, which by definition need a careful, experienced and well-trained hand.

The constant changes in primary schools can often leave RE leaders feeling lost, seeking support from curriculum models. Since Ofsted’s inspection framework review, discussions about curriculum have increased, including in RE. We have all learnt to research deeply, take holiday trips to places linked to the themes that we are due to teach and have many areas of ‘geeky’ level knowledge. As subject leaders in primary schools, we have had to deepen our understanding and knowledge of subjects that may not have been the ones that we studied at degree level but in all of this primary teachers work hard and do an incredible job.

Recently, multi-academy trusts have been handing over curriculum design to secondary colleagues, frustrating many primary RE specialists. Comments like “I’m designing the primary curriculum so I know what I’ll get in Year 7” or ‘I have primary aged children at home so I know what they can do’ are common and infuriating. Like the rest of my primary colleagues, I trained for four years to do my job, I have taken part in RE CPD, I lead RE CPD and I aim to inspire primary RE leaders of the future so that curriculums can be designed with primary specific pedagogy in mind. Primary curriculums should be designed and led by those trained in primary pedagogy.

This trend is causing talented primary RE leaders to leave the field. I have been deeply saddened to see many talented primary RE leaders leave national RE communities and discussions to head towards other leadership areas because the doors are closed to them because they teach in primary rather than secondary. As the first primary National Association of Teachers of RE (NATRE) chair in 28 years, I sometimes worry about being taken seriously because I teach younger children. The assumption that secondary teachers can plan for primary but not vice versa is flawed.

I’m fortunate to work in a school that values RE and supports my leadership. This should be the norm. Primary RE leaders spend all week with their pupils, understanding their needs and are able to carefully consider the pedagogy and steps to learning that their children will need in order to tackle tricky concepts and ideas within the RE classroom.. We must consider the whole child’s educational journey in RE.

Dr. Richard Kueh’s tree analogy at Strictly RE highlights the importance of phase-specific care. He explained that a child’s journey through RE starts at the roots (Foundation stage), moves through the trunk (Key Stage One and Two) and branches out in secondary schools. This image has stuck with me, we need cross-phase discussions but must respect each other’s roles.
I call on schools, trusts and other organisations to remember the importance of valuing leadership that is firmly rooted in experience, training and pedagogy that is phase specific.

• Primary RE curriculum and leadership requires primary expertise
• Value and champion Primary RE leaders, providing them with opportunities and invest in primary specific CPD. The teaching community should champion primary RE leaders, acknowledging their hard work and dedication, and ensuring that primary leadership roles are valued and supported.
• Cross phase collaboration is essential it’s crucial to respect the roles and expertise of primary and secondary educators, ensuring that primary RE leaders have a voice in curriculum design.
  Primary RE teachers, you are amazing. Thank you for your dedication and hard work. Let’s champion primary RE leaders and ensure we don’t wait another 28 years for a primary NATRE chair.