Did you know that people in West Africa had developed inoculation against smallpox long before people in America and Europe? In this blog, which you could share with pupils during Black History Month, you will find a podcast, some articles and suggestions for teaching (KS2 and KS3).
We find Cotton Mather, a Christian priest and slave owner in Boston, whose slave, a man from West Africa, was able to tell him about a technique to innoculate people against smallpox. However it took another 100 years for scientists in Europe and America to apply the technology. Why did it take so long? Have a look at this resource to find out and explore the worldviews that led to this situation.
Kate is a Secondary teacher and Saima is a Primary teacher. We both listened to a podcast called Cautionary Tales by Tim Hartford and found it extremely interesting. The episode that got us talking is called ‘How to end a pandemic’. We have created a padlet containing the episode and suggested teaching ideas, this is referenced at the end of the blog.
The episode opens in Boston Massachusetts where smallpox pandemics ravaged the population every 10 or 15 years between the 1600s and early 1700s. We are introduced to Cotton Mather, a priest and amateur scientist. Mather is also a slave owner, who received a slave from his church congregation as a gift. He named this man, originally from West Africa, ‘Onesimus’.
Mather was anxious about the constant threat of a smallpox outbreak. He asked Onesimus if he had ever had smallpox in Africa. Onesimus described a strange procedure: a person with smallpox had a blister cut open; the skin of a heathy person was cut and some blister fluid was rubbed into the wound. The recipient fell ill after some days, but not fatally so. When they recovered they never contracted smallpox. Mather began to interview many other Africans in Boston and found that this practice was widespread in West Africa.
The following year Mather read in the Royal Society’s scientific journal the report of a Greek doctor in Turkey documenting an almost identical procedure.
As a modern listener it is fascinating to recognize the science of inoculation as a common practice in West Africa and Turkey long before Europe and North America. But what really grabbed our attention was the wall of indifference and outright disbelief with which Mather was received. As Hartford suggests, the white Bostonian, and wider American, scientific community simply could not believe that Africa or Turkey could teach America anything. Years passed before the benefits of inoculation could be brought to America and Europe, years in which many more people died. What this story reveals is the impact of a white view of the world.
Saima:
On listening to this story, I was grabbed by the fact that a church congregation bought a slave for the priest. I knew that my year 6 class would be horrified that this happened. The social injustice would have stood out to them and made them question what they had just heard. In schools, we teach pupils about the Christian religion as peace-loving and caring: this part of the story would make children want to use a critical lens to examine the content of what they were hearing. The question to be explored being “What right did the Christians have to buy someone to be used as a slave?” Then, they would dig deeper to explore the racial injustice of white people buying black people. Why did the Christian, white people think they were doing the right thing by buying their priest a black slave?
Kate:
I was particularly interested in the way white racism, or whiteness, was revealed by this story. A life-saving treatment was ignored for years not because of scientific limitations, but because of a negative view of non-white people. For me this provides a case study that reveals racialized thinking. We usually look at its results, but not the structures of the thinking itself. If whiteness is a worldview it can be taught and students can be assisted to make sense of it.
Saima:
With a view to planning for teaching around black history, I would certainly use this story in the classroom with my year 6 pupils. There’s nothing better that eleven year olds like than to get into a really ‘meaty’ subject matter. I know my pupils would want to talk about this discrimination and ask questions themselves.
Kate:
We agree that the wider context is crucial in exploring this sequence of events. Learning more about African innovation alone is not the whole story. It is some of the story, but not the whole story. The whole story includes context. The context is whiteness, or a white view of black people. It is the view that stopped men of science, desperate to protect their communities from this devastating disease, from seeing what was before their eyes. It is not so much about black achievement, as the blindness that stops the world appreciating black achievement. The blindness is what I am more interested in exploring. This seems to me to be the unlocking understanding.
Saima:
Within the context of the Primary phase, we do already study positive black role models. However, we need to move on from there if we want change to happen. Why must we continue to see white people treat non-white people in such a discriminatory manner? We need to take a deep breath and explore whiteness itself. Our curriculum must reflect this need for change if our future generations are to end this cycle of hate and inequality. It’s time to step up and move forward. We must stop being ‘non-racist’ and become anti-racist instead.
Access the padlet to find the podcast episode plus teaching suggestions and resources: https://padlet.com/REth1nk/dx3b2iou5otywfsk
Dr Kate Christopher teaches part-time in a secondary school in inner London, is an RE Advisor and is Culham St Gabriel’s Lead Consultant for Professional Development.
Saima Saleh is RE SLE, Year 6 teacher and member of the NATRE Executive.