Viewing archives for Blog

This story begins with the Biblos project (2004), led by a master storyteller, Terence Copley. In Biblos, we investigated how the Bible is, and should be, taught in Religious Education (RE). We dealt with:

  1. Biblical stories to exemplify the selected themes of encounter, vulnerability and destiny
  2. The overarching Bible’s story from covenant to re-call and promise in the Jewish Bible, and from Creation and Fall to Redemption and Restoration in the Christian Bible
  3. The story of the Bible, referring to how the Bible as a collection of books, and each book therein, came to be.

Biblos

Biblos was influenced by historical-critical approaches, seeking to put the text in context: what did the original text say, what sources did the author(s) use, from what oral traditions and social settings did the text emerge, and how did the author(s) edit the material?

These ‘stories within stories’ can be called ‘nested narratives’. Nested like a Russian (Matryoshka) doll in which hollow figures of decreasing size are stacked. Pupils can engage in layers of learning associated with each nested narrative and the connections between them.

In hindsight, stories of the Bible’s reception throughout history could have received greater emphasis: how biblical narratives have been interpreted, appropriated and used in different ways, both inside and outside the Christian tradition (e.g. in liturgy, music, art, prose, poetry, drama and film). Such stories seek to put the reader in context.

The Art of Narrative Theology

Stories of how the Bible has shaped, and continues to shape, identities and life-histories also merited closer examination. To rectify this, I worked with theologians on the Art of Narrative Theology project (2013). We considered narrative philosophy and the idea that individuals and communities are ‘formed’ by reading, sharing and living ‘within’ stories which tell of their convictions about the way the world is and where truth is to be found. We also reflected upon narrative theology which sees the Bible as a set of stories about God’s revelation and redemptive love, and sees Christian communities as being informed by, and dwelling within, the Christian story of salvation.

We wondered whether pupils could understand:

  • themselves and others narratively, reflecting upon their identities and life-histories, and the communities, traditions and worldviews of which they are a part
  • how such narrative positioning plays out in stories of how individuals and communities read and relate to the Bible.

The Art of Bible reading

To assist this, we incorporated the quirky, contemporary biblical paintings of British artist Brian J. Turner into The Art of Bible Reading (2014). This textbook promotes four layers of learning:

  1. Encountering narrative: pupils learn about the story, characters, setting and plot of a biblical story, and how it has been represented in a painting by Turner
  2. Interpreting narrative: pupils view Turner’s painting as his own personal reading of the story, and consider how his life-story (e.g. beliefs, experiences and encounters) has influenced his interpretation and how his interpretation has influenced his life-story
  3. Understanding narrative in community contexts: pupils consider the significance of the story for different Christian communities, including how their interpretations have shaped, and been shaped by, those communities and their contexts
  4. Reflecting on narratives of self and others: pupils consider whether they would interpret and portray the biblical story in the same way as Turner, and whether their response is a consequence of the narratives forming their own identities (e.g. ideas, beliefs, people and experiences).

Through these layers of learning, pupils reflect on the relationship between their narrative sense of self and the narratives of the Christian tradition whether they perceive themselves as part of, or in relation to, Christian narratives. They learn that biblical stories and the Bible’s story can be understood in different ways, by different people, with different identities and life-stories, at different times and places.

Who is Jesus?

This insight inspired our textbook, Who is Jesus? (2018), which examines the figure of Jesus using the sources, methods, theories and perspectives of a variety of real and fictional ‘academics’ (e.g. a biblical scholar, theologian, church historian, and scholar of Islam). In each chapter, these researchers engage with answers to the question ‘Who is Jesus?’ from historians, gospel writers, Muslims, feminists, the visually-impaired, different cultures, today’s Church, and a contemporary artist. Thereby, pupils encounter a study of stories and a story of studies.

The textbook’s ‘multi-story’ exploration of stories, story-tellers, story-recipients, story-interpreters, and so forth, exemplifies the nested nature of narratives in RE and the diversity of disciplinary, methodological and interpretative approaches to their study. By navigating these layers of learning, pupils become critically aware of the varied, complex and changeable characters, settings and plots in the subject-discipline of RE. They also become reflective and reflexive about their dual role within the subject’s story as both central characters and co-authors with their peers and their teachers.

In advocating the benefits of thinking narratively about RE as a subject-discipline, those who study and teach it, and the ways in which they do so, I bring this story-themed story of research to an end.

We all carry ways of understanding life that shape how we see the world, relate to others, and make sense of everyday experiences. These understandings aren’t just beliefs – they’re lived and shaped by our relationships and choices. Personal worldview stories bring this to life, showing how religious and non-religious worldviews are experienced in practice. Alongside substantive and disciplinary knowledge, these stories invite students to reflect on their own perspectives in relation to others, supporting their development of personal knowledge.

The Power of Personal Stories

Personal stories matter because they show how religious and non-religious worldviews are lived, not just believed. Ideas about meaning, morality, or belief can feel abstract until they are grounded in real human experience. Stories reveal how values are formed and help us understand not only what people believe, but why those beliefs matter in the context of everyday life.

Stories also reveal complexity. Few people hold neat, internally consistent worldviews. Personal narratives make space for doubt and development over time, challenging simplistic or stereotypical representations of religious and non-religious traditions. Bhabha (1994) introduces the concept of hybridity which describes how identities and practices can blend influences from different traditions, showing how worldviews are often mixed and evolving.  Through stories, we see how individuals interpret, negotiate, and sometimes resist inherited ideas, reflecting the reality that worldviews are dynamic rather than fixed or uniform.

Insider and Outsider Perspectives

The academic study of religion and worldviews has long drawn on the distinction between insider and outsider perspectives. Insiders speak from within a worldview, drawing on lived experience, while outsiders approach a worldview from beyond it, often bringing comparison and critical distance. Scholars such as Ninian Smart have highlighted the value of both perspectives, while recognising their limitations (Smart, 1998).

Personal worldview stories centre insider voices, giving space for people to explain what beliefs and practices mean in the context of their own lives. At the same time, a disciplinary approach goes beyond simply listening. Following Robert Jackson’s interpretive approach, these insider perspectives are explored alongside broader social, historical, and conceptual understandings, helping students to engage critically as well as empathetically (Jackson, 2004).

More recent work in the human and social sciences challenges the idea that insider and outsider are fixed categories. Crossley, Arthur, and McNess argue that these positions are fluid and relational, shaped by context, purpose, and relationships (Crossley, Arthur & McNess, 2003). Kim Knott similarly emphasises positioning and reflexivity in the study of religion (Knott, 2005). For students, this matters because they are rarely pure insiders or outsiders. Personal worldview stories reflect this complexity far better than fixed labels.

Cumbria Virtual Voices in Religious Education

The Cumbria Virtual Voices in Religious Education Project, developed during the COVID-19 pandemic, offers a practical example of how personal worldview stories can be used. The project brought together a group of voices with connections to Cumbria and worked intentionally to build a supportive community.

Before working with students directly, the community of voices took part in sessions rooted in Philosophy For Chidren (P4C[1] ) informed pedagogy, focusing on enquiry, reflection, listening, and dialogue. As a community, they explored creative ways of telling their personal worldview stories, drawing on storytelling techniques and the use of objects and artwork.

Each story was shaped by the individual voice. One Buddhist voice used a Russian doll to describe the layered experiences that led them to become a Buddhist while at university. An Orthodox Christian voice used an icon to articulate their personal worldview story. These objects acted as meaning-making tools rather than explanatory props.

Around twelve short films were created, each lasting 2–3 minutes, with no set structure. Together, they offered students rich insider perspectives that resisted stereotypes and highlighted diversity within and across worldviews. Used as preparation before facilitated events with other schools, the films supported more thoughtful dialogue and continue to be used today as a legacy resource.

Listening, Dialogue, and Understanding

In a diverse and often polarised society, personal worldview stories support respectful dialogue. They shift learning away from debates about right or wrong belief and towards understanding how worldviews are formed, lived, and sustained. Listening does not require agreement, but it does require curiosity, reflexivity, and awareness of one’s own standpoint.

Personal worldview stories are not add-ons to substantive knowledge. As part of a disciplinary approach, they connect insider experience with outsider analysis, personal meaning with social context, and empathy with critical thinking – while also creating space for pupils to reflect on their own developing worldviews.

Bibliography

Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.

Crossley, M., Arthur, L. & McNess, E. (2003). Insider–Outsider Research in Comparative and International Education. Oxford: Symposium Books.

Jackson, R. (2004). Rethinking Religious Education and Plurality: Issues in Diversity and Pedagogy. London: Routledge Falmer.

Knott, K. (2005). The Location of Religion: A Spatial Analysis. London: Equinox.

Smart, N. (1998). The World’s Religions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

The Cumbria Virtual Voices in Religious Education (VVRE) was a collaborative project between Cumbrian SACRE and Cumbria Development Education Centre (CDEC) funded by Culham St Gabriels Trust.  You can access the virtual resources on:  https://www.cdec.org.uk/what-we-offer/projects/cumbria-virtual-voices-in-religious-education/ or find similar examples on the RE hubs film section: https://www.re-hubs.uk/upskill/resources/films-in-re/

[1] P4C – Philosophy for Children P4C  https://www.sapere.org.uk/

When students ask whether faith has anything to say to modern life, the Catholic saints can sometimes feel like the wrong place to start. Too often, they appear distant – they are shaped by another century, another culture, another set of assumptions.

Carlo Acutis changes that conversation.

A teenager who loved coding, gaming, and football, Saint Carlo shows what Catholic belief can look like when it is lived seriously in the contemporary world – not as nostalgia, but as conviction.

Carlo was born in London in 1991 to Italian parents before his family returned to Milan. His upbringing was not conventionally “religious” in the way we might expect of a future saint. His parents were not regular Mass-goers, and there was no intense devotional culture at home. Yet from an early age, Carlo displayed a quiet attentiveness to faith. He asked questions, noticed details, and chose practices that slowly, but deliberately, shaped his life.

After receiving his First Holy Communion at the age of seven, Carlo chose to attend Mass daily. He developed a deep love for the rosary, reading Scripture, and acts of charity – particularly towards the poor, migrants, and those sleeping rough around Milan. These were not dramatic gestures, but steady habits. His faith was rooted in Catholic tradition, disciplined rather than showy, ordinary rather than performative.

A child of his generation

At the same time, Carlo was unmistakably a child of his generation. He loved football, video games, and technology. Like many young people of the 1990s and early 2000s, he taught himself coding, web design, and programming, becoming skilled enough to help others build websites. This is what makes him a genuinely millennial saint. Carlo did not reject modern life in order to be holy; he inhabited it fully and learned how to live faithfully within it.

At the centre of everything was Carlo’s devotion to the Eucharist. He famously described it as his “motorway to heaven” – a phrase that is often quoted because it is both ordinary and profound. For Carlo, the Eucharist was not background scenery to his faith, but the place where Christ was encountered most fully. This conviction shaped how he used his time, his talents, and his energy.

Cataloguing miracles on the web

His best-known project was a digital exhibition cataloguing Eucharistic miracles from around the world. As a teenager, Carlo researched historical accounts, visited sites, gathered sources, and presented them online with clarity and care. His aim was not to sensationalise, but to show that belief in the Real Presence was not an abstract claim – it was something the Church had taken seriously, consistently, and globally.

One example Carlo researched was the Eucharistic miracle of Lanciano. In the eighth century, a priest struggling with doubt is said to have witnessed the consecrated host and wine transform into flesh and blood during Mass. In the 1970s, independent scientific analysis identified the flesh as human heart tissue and the blood as real human blood, preserved without additives. Carlo did not use such accounts to “prove” belief to sceptics, but to point back to what Catholics already claim happens every single time Mass is celebrated.

A life cut short

Carlo’s life was tragically short. In 2006, he was diagnosed with an aggressive form of leukaemia and died within days, aged just fifteen. Even during his illness, accounts describe a calm acceptance and a concern for others rather than himself. He was beatified in 2020 and is often described as a “patron saint of the internet” – a label students immediately connect to. He was formally declared a saint on 7 September 2025.

As one young Catholic from London in Rome reflected, “The fact that you can think of a Saint doing the same things as you – wearing jeans, playing video games – it feels so much closer than other saints have in the past.”

For RE teachers, Saint Carlo’s biography does important work. He helps bridge the gap students often feel between holiness and normality, faith and technology, tradition and modern life. He offers a contemporary reference point for Catholic belief without diluting its depth or demands.

Saint Carlo Acutis offers something rare: a life close enough to feel recognisable, yet deep enough to stretch our understanding. His story does not demand instant or forced belief in the Eucharist – but it does invite serious attention to what Catholics claim is at the heart of their faith.

His website remains online here: https://www.miracolieucaristici.org/en/liste/list.html

The throne stood on a platform, spot-lit by a shaft of light that fell from a high window. Sitting between the ornately-carved armrests was the Queen herself, resplendent in her robes and crown. Her eyes swept the room and the assembled courtiers quailed beneath her gaze.

                  “I demand to know the secret!” she bellowed, “Which of you cringing curs will tell me? How many more of you have to lose your heads before it is revealed?”

                  “But your Majesty,” babbled the Lord Chamberlain, “The secret is known only to a chosen few! Alchemists, sorcerers – practitioners of the dark arts!”

                  “Aha! Then I have just the person,” crowed the Queen, “He is presently a resident of the deepest dungeons beneath the castle.” She pointed a long fingernail at a chain-mailed guard.

                  “You! Bring me… the Scrivener!”

                  The guard rattled off and soon returned, dragging a thin old man with straggling hair and beard, dressed in rags, and pathetically gripping a quill pen. With a shove from the guard, he fell at the Queen’s feet.

                  “You! Scrivener! Tell me the secret! How does one conjure dreams? How is the imagination harnessed to my will?”

                  “Forgive me, your Majesty,” said the Scrivener with trembling lips, “But do you mean, how does one tell a story?”

                  “Yes! Storytelling! I demand to know how it is done.”

                  “Well… I don’t know. I just sort of start writing, really. I’ve never had to explain it to someone else before.”

A terrible stillness fell across the room. Then, with a quiet creak, the Queen leaned forward and hissed, “I would advise you to try…”

_______________________

It wasn’t exactly like that. We might be exaggerating a little. But when the good people of Culham St Gabriel’s asked us to write about storytelling and how we do it here at CTVC Ltd – we were slightly at a loss. It’s difficult to describe, but we’re going to give it a try…

We have a website for schools called TrueTube, and strapline is, “short films, big stories”. But why tell stories in the first place?

We all like a story. We love to be transported to other worlds and live other lives in our imaginations.

We think in stories. If someone asks you how your day was, what do you do? You launch into a story – maybe about the nightmare journey home, or about the Year 9 boy who did a pitch-perfect impression of the Head Teacher.

Non-fiction is better when told as a story. One of the Digital Team at CTVC (mentioning no names) got a terrible grade for his A-Level History because the list of dates and treaties made no impression on his young brain. In later years, he read Wolf Hall by Hilary Mantel and realised that it was his A-Level syllabus in story form. If only it had existed back then.

Stories are a great way to impart information, because they entertain, encourage empathy, and increase our understanding. So, we tell stories with an ulterior motive: to teach our audience something.

We start by asking what sort of story will best suit the subject matter and the age group: a drama? An animation? A real-life case-study? What will engage our young audience while we provide them with the required information?

Boringly, we also have to consider the budget. We might have ambitions to make a big drama, or a multi-voiced animation, but these things cost a lot of money.

Who’s it for?

We think of the TrueTube audience as young people in a classroom. They are, almost literally, a captive audience. We’re not trying to make clickbait – something to grab the attention of someone idly scrolling through their social media. Our films can afford to be unashamedly informational rather than primarily entertainment – although we try to be entertaining as well! We were once asked to cut short a sequence that showed a Muslim doing wudu before prayer – “He’s washing, I get it, let’s move on…” – and in a piece of entertainment you would, but seeing the complete process is helpful for pupils learning about Islam.

What’s it for?

In the white heat of creation, it can be easy to lose track of what a film is for – “We could do this! Or that! How about…?” But like a good lesson plan, there’s always a clear objective which we keep in mind when developing an idea, writing a script, and shooting the film. It has to do the job.

Straight on or sideways?

Sometimes, the best way to tell a story is as straight-forwardly as possible. We’ve done this in our festivals films – Diwali, Vaisakhi, Bandi Chhor Divas, Eid ul-Adha – with just a narrator and some pictures. This is partly budgetary (yawn), but also because the story is informational in this context – it’s there to explain why the festival is taking place.

Other times we sidle up to a story rather than coming at it straight on. This might be because the story has been told many times before, so we want the audience to look at it with new eyes. For example, Jesus feeding the 5000 becomes a TV cooking competition; Jesus healing a leper becomes a make-over show; and the story of Samson becomes a superhero movie – albeit one that’s crammed into a five-minute animation. Or it might be that a story will be unfamiliar to most of the audience and needs a hook to draw them in. The Demon’s Head is about the Hindu goddesses Durga and Kali defeating a demon. It’s a gory tale, so it was given the framing device of a Hammer Horror film, with a spooky Peter Cushing-like narrator telling the story behind an exhibit in his collection of arcane artefacts. Or “really weird stuff…” as he puts it.

Reverence

Beliefs are an important part of people’s identities and personalities, so we always treat religions with respect. This can create challenges, for example: making an animation called How Islam Began – In Ten Minutes, when we couldn’t show any of the main players in the story. But we find ways around it.

But “reverence”? Yes, up to a point. We really don’t want to offend anyone, but we’re not of the opinion that you can’t talk about religion with humour or colloquial language.

Let people tell their own stories

With an increasing emphasis on “Worldviews” in the RE Curriculum, it’s often best to let people share their own stories. What do they believe? Ask them. How does it affect their decisions and everyday lives? Ask them.

But the approach is not without pitfalls. It often comes down to the “casting” – finding someone who can talk fluently and engagingly about their beliefs.

What is Truth?

We don’t want to make truth claims for any particular religion. Everything is couched in terms of, “I’m a Christian and I believe that…”, or, “Muslims believe that…”. We’re sometimes offered films by other organisations, but we often have to them down because they presume that everyone is of the same religion – “This is what we all believe, isn’t it?” – or even seek to convert.

Mind your language

Vocabulary is always a big issue. People from any community – whether that’s a religion, a school staff-room, a sports team or a fan club – will have very specific vocabulary which to them is completely normal and accessible. It never is.

And for some reason, whenever people talk about religion, they suddenly start speaking like an academic. We once had to stop a young presenter from saying, “And thus…” every time she began an explanation.

We will do what’s called a “pre-interview” with contributors – basically a chat in advance of filming to hear what they have to say, and to decide which questions to ask when the cameras are rolling. Inevitably, a lot of pre-interview time will be taken up with trying to find ways around tricky vocab. We either don’t use difficult words, or use them in a context that makes their meaning clear. The old adage, “show don’t tell” is a useful one. Or, we just explain any new words, but in very simple terms. There’s no point in giving a definition that needs more definitions to understand.

We’ve found that saying to a contributor, “How would you explain that more simply?” forces them to think for themselves – possibly for the first time – about what something actually means, rather than just repeating what they’ve always been told. It becomes their personal story, told in their own way.

Ignorance, not stupidity

We assume complete ignorance – in the true sense of the word. Our young audience is intelligent and curious, but they know next to nothing about this topic. If we explain things simply, they’ll get it.

This might mean leaving some things out, because if someone mentions this other thing, then that will have to be explained as well, and by the time we’ve circled back to whatever we were talking about in the first place… sorry, where were we?

Yes, but…

We were once accused of “being reductive”, which is a polite way of saying we’re “dumbing down”, but you have to start somewhere. We use religious consultants to check that everything we say is accurate and not misleading, and we ask them to repress the instinct to say, “Yes, but…”.

“Is the script accurate?”

“Yes, but… in some denominations there’s a slightly different interpretation of…” and suddenly you’re overwhelming the audience with too much information.

There’s also the danger of stereotyping. We made a film about the 5 Ks in Sikhi, and an educational consultant (who wasn’t a Sikh) pointed out that not all Sikhs wear all Five Ks, so the film was presenting a stereotype. But we can’t make a film by pointing a camera at things that people don’t do.

It’s not possible explain the whole of a religion or a worldview in a ten-minute film, but we can put up hooks in people’s heads on which to hang new information at a later date.

Storytelling

Stories engage our emotions and our curiosity. We are drawn in by an interesting situation, or intriguing characters. We want to know more.

  • Stories often include sensory details to help us picture what’s going on – the sights, sounds and smells. We feel what it’s like to be in this place or in that situation.
  • Stories have characters – real or made up – that we care about or identify with or find fascinating.
  • Stories take us on a journey. But too many side-steps, and you’ll lose sight of the destination.
  • Stories have a beginning, a middle and an end. But stories can begin in the middle, or even at the end. We might be plunged straight into a predicament, and have to get our bearings.
  • Stories can be told in as many ways as there are people, and we do it naturally. Have fun with it.

_______________________

“…and that’s it, really,” finished the Scrivener and shrugged his bony shoulders. The Queen looked thoughtful.

                  “Are you telling me this is something anyone could do?” she said.

                  “Yes. I mean, it takes practice… but yes! Would you like to borrow my quill?” The Queen snatched the pen from the Scrivener’s outstretched hand.

                  “Thank you! I will be writing my own stories from now on. I have no need of Scriveners! Take him back to the dungeons!”

                  The guard grabbed the old man and dragged him out of the room. The Scrivener’s pleading voice grew fainter and fainter as he was taken below.

                  “But…your Majesty! Please…! I can also offer my services as an editor…”

                  The Queen unrolled a piece of parchment on her lap, and the Chamberlain hurried forwards, holding a pot of ink on a little silver tray. The Queen dipped her quill into the ink, paused for a moment… and then began to write.

“Books are sometimes windows, offering views of worlds that may be real or imagined, familiar or strange. These windows are also sliding glass doors, and readers have only to walk through in imagination to become part of whatever world has been created or recreated by the author. When lighting conditions are just right, however, a window can also be a mirror.”*

Stories matter deeply in Religious Education because they shape how children understand themselves, others and the wider world. Books can act as windows, to see the world beyond their own lives and location, mirrors, allowing pupils to see their own lives, families, questions and beliefs reflected back at them. They can also act as doors or, in Dr Rudine Sims Bishop’s* phrase, glass sliding doors; offering children a way into experiences, worldviews and religious and non-religious lives that may be different from their own, but which they can step into safely, imaginatively and thoughtfully.

In RE/RME/RVE, this matters because religious and non-religious worldviews are not just a set of ideas to be learned about , but people’s lived experience. Carefully chosen stories allow pupils to stand alongside characters, to “walk through” moments of prayer, doubt, celebration or challenge, and to explore what it might feel like to belong to a religious or non-religious worldview. Children’s literature provides a safe space to explore empathy, identity and meaning; a place where big questions about life, death, purpose and the numinous can be encountered without risk, because the experience is mediated through story.

At the same time, books can affirm children’s own identities and experiences. When pupils see themselves represented, in family life, culture, belief, language or practice, they learn that their stories matter. Texts such as Planet Omar by Zanib Mian or Malala’s Magic Pencil by Malala Yousafzai are not just windows into Islam; they are mirrors for some children and powerful correctives to stereotypes for others. In RE/RME/RVE, this means paying close attention to authorial intent, representation and pupil response, and creating space to ask:

  • Is this true to your experience?
  • What feels familiar?
  • What feels new?

Used well, stories help RE move beyond surface knowledge. They support critical literacy, deepen subject understanding and invite pupils into respectful, thoughtful dialogue about belief, belonging and what it means to be human. During the RE:Online Power of Story focus week and in this National Year of Reading, we are reminded that stories do not simply teach about religion; they help children encounter it, question it, and sometimes recognise themselves within it.

In classroom practice, thinking about books as windows, mirrors and glass sliding doors invites teachers to be intentional in how stories are chosen, read and discussed. This means creating opportunities for pupils to respond personally to texts, to ask questions, and to reflect on what a story shows and what it leaves out. It involves slowing down reading, returning to key moments, and using talk, drama, writing or enquiry strategies to explore belief, identity and meaning. Teachers can model critical literacy by drawing attention to authorial intent and encouraging pupils to compare stories with real lived experiences, including those within their own class or community. Used in this way, stories become more than illustrations of content; they become starting points for dialogue, empathy and deeper understanding, helping pupils learn not just about religious and non-religious worldviews, but also to consider their own personal worldview.

*From Rudine Sims Bishop, “Mirrors, Windows, and Sliding Glass Doors,” Perspectives: Choosing and Using Books from the Classroom 6, no. 3 (Summer 1990), available at Reading Is Fundamental (January 2015)

The conceptual position of the recent Curriculum and Assessment Review (CAR) was to favour long-term, incremental improvements over dramatic changes.  A Levels were framed as unproblematic, and pragmatically one can see the case for leaving alone ‘what works.’

However, the obvious problem is that Religious Studies and Philosophy specifications at A Level contain very little on the lives and works of women.

Women’s works are excluded even where their contributions to the disciplines are obvious.  In some specifications, for example, students may learn about abortion from exclusively male perspectives.  Sometimes women’s ideas are included but unreferenced, and sometimes there are simply missed opportunities to include an accurate history of ideas from around the globe, e.g. on human rights, the environment, ethics of care, bioethics or immigration.  In 1979, Adrienne Rich commented on the ‘relentless excision of the female[1]’, which necessitates a kind of ‘revolution in permanence’.  It seems remarkable that this should still be the case in 2026.

Others have of course drawn attention to the issue, such as the End Sexism In Schools charity, and a student-led petition in 2015. Awarding bodies have started to signpost supplementary resources, and these are welcome. Meanwhile, teachers across the country create their own more equitable resources, ensuring representation of diverse voices.

However, as long as there is no or little requirement to study women in ‘official’ curricular, the message to students is clear: women’s works are not worthy of study. I see this as an urgent, inescapable moral problem – an example of a profound, overlooked curricular injustice that may cause harm.  Collective efforts to address harmful attitudes to women and girls nationally are undermined if they are effectively silenced in the curriculum.  Likewise for Sustainable Development Goal 4.7 (ensuring acquisition of knowledge to promote gender equality and cultural diversity).

To help counter some of these concerns in my last school, we co-created a weekly book club with students in KS4-5, with a view to diversifying the reading materials on offer.  This was light-touch but allowed for meaningful discussion and debate.  A few texts that have worked well and can be adapted for different settings include:

Kristin Shrader Frechette – Environmental Justice: Creating Equality, Reclaiming Democracy (2002).  This book offers an accessible application of the philosophy of science, containing case studies such as the decision to dump chemical waste in locations most affecting already disenfranchised minority groups.  Highlighting the extent of human suffering may help students to engage intellectually and emotionally with the subject matter, and provide interesting stimulus for group discussions.

Mary Midgely – What is Philosophy For? (2018).  In her final work, Midgely reminded us of her definition of philosophy – not as the solving of one fixed set of puzzles, but instead finding ‘many particular ways of thinking’ to help us ask fresh questions and navigate new challenges.  Midgely offers her stance on the mind/body problem, verificationism, religious worldviews in a digital age and, of course, our treatment of animals.

Dan McQuillan – Resisting AI (2022). This book draws on the work of several female philosophers to raise ethical objections to generative AI, including Hannah Arendt on institutional thoughtlessness, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak on epistemic violence, and Judith Butler on performativity.  This could provide a good level of stretch and challenge for students thinking of studying ethics related courses at university.

Whilst I have been encouraged by high levels of student engagement with these ideas, it must be said that adding more diverse thinkers to old specifications is not enough. More radical reform will require careful, detailed scholarship on the extent and implications of omissions. Pupils deserve access to a range of religious and philosophical responses – both contemporary and historical – to existential questions.

[1] ‘What does a woman need to know?’

It feels fitting to start a blog about stories by mentioning a book: “Why Don’t Students Like School?” by Daniel Willingham. In it, Willingham describes the human mind as being “exquisitely tuned to understand and remember stories”. That idea has shaped my curriculum work in three different ways: revisiting stories over time, using stories to teach concepts and vocabulary, and telling our local story.

This is underpinned by deliberate curriculum sequencing, so stories are not isolated moments but part of a coherent journey where knowledge, concepts and disciplinary thinking accumulate over time.

1. Revisit stories over time to build knowledge

From four-year-olds upwards, our curriculum is packed with stories. This is particularly noticeable from our curriculum for four-year-olds to that for up to nine- year-olds. We often begin by teaching the narrative of a story, asking questions about meaning and linking it to children’s own experiences. For example, we might tell the Christmas story and connect it to familiar ideas such as receiving gifts or being excited about the arrival of a baby.

Through the curriculum for 5–11-year-olds, we start attaching concepts to that story, such as incarnation or the idea of Jesus as saviour. For 11–14-year-olds, in a unit on the Abrahamic faiths, students might explore Islamic versions of Jesus’ birth or look at stories from non-canonical gospels that appear to have been familiar in the early Islamic world. For 14–16-year-olds, they encounter a womanist reading of the story alongside different Christian celebrations. By the time students reach 16-18, they examine how Matthew and Luke construct theological portraits of Jesus.

Each time, students return to the same core narrative, but with deeper concepts, richer context, and increasingly sophisticated disciplinary tools. If a student stays with us to A Level, they will have returned to this story many times. It never becomes dull, because they encounter it through different worldviews and disciplinary lenses. Crucially, revisiting familiar narratives frees cognitive space. Students are not learning a new plot or cast of characters, so they can do more challenging thinking with the material.

2. Use stories to teach concepts and vocabulary

Once I accepted that the brain privileges stories, I began creating narratives to introduce key thinkers and ideas.

We tell the story of Heraclitus, famously melancholy, who feels he cannot truly know anything because everything is in constant flux. Later we meet Aristotle, endlessly curious about the changing world, even falling out with his teacher, Plato.

Students’ favourite story is often Thomas Aquinas. They love hearing about a young boy not cut out to be a crusading knight, instead destined for life in the Church. He shocks everyone by choosing the “wrong” religious order, is kidnapped by his brothers, and yet all he wants to do is read his Bible. When he later discovers Aristotle’s works, he realises he can study both scripture and the natural world.

These individual stories become part of a much bigger narrative we tell to our 5-7 year olds onwards: the story of empiricism and later natural theology.

3.Tell your local story to build identity and belonging

I moved to Norfolk in 2020 and still have the zeal of a convert. Norwich claims to be the City of Stories, and I quickly realised that as a Trust Lead I wanted our RE curriculum to tell those stories too.

Our developing curriculum includes figures such as Julian of Norwich, Edith Cavell, Sophia Duleep Singh, Abdalqadir as-Sufi and Thomas Paine. We also tell the story of Norfolk’s rebellious nature: a county where Norwich once claimed a church for every week of the year. When you visit Norwich today, you are still struck by the sheer number of church buildings, yet census data now places us alongside Brighton with one of the highest percentages of “nones”. We deliberately explore this tension through social science and worldview lenses, helping students think about continuity, change and what belief looks like in lived local contexts.

One of my hopes for a national curriculum is that it includes a local unit, and that SACREs are supported to help schools identify their own stories, alongside CPD to help teachers weave them thoughtfully into curriculum design. Because every place has a story. The question is whether we choose to tell it.

I hope this inspires you to look back at your own curriculum and reflect on how you use stories: the stories students revisit over time, the stories that help them grasp big ideas and vocabulary, and the local stories that shape their sense of place and identity.

Reflecting on the opportunity to speak at a National Conference

Early in the spring term, I had a conversation with my Culham St Gabriel’s Leadership Programme mentor about presenting at a national conference. The joint AULRE (Association of University Lecturers of Religion and Education) and AREIAC (Association of RE Inspectors, Advisers and Consultants) conference was coming up in Exeter.

“You’ll get a lot from doing a presentation there.”
“I think you’ll come away disappointed if you don’t.”
“You’re ready to step up, you’ve done local ones. Now it’s time to challenge yourself.”

With those words of encouragement, I submitted a proposal. When it was accepted and I saw my name on the schedule, I felt both delighted and apprehensive. My mentor was right, I enjoyed the experience and learned a lot. Here are some reflections and tips I’d like to share:

1. Fail to Prepare, Prepare to Fail

Benjamin Franklin’s quote may be familiar, but it’s worth repeating. Success often comes from careful planning and thoughtful preparation.

2. Know Your Audience

Before planning your presentation, ask: Who am I speaking to?
My audience included teachers from across the country, professional bodies, and university lecturers. I wondered, Do they really want to hear what I’ve got to say?
The answer was a resounding yes. The real question became: What do I want to say?

3. Choose a Topic You Know Well

You are the expert during your talk. Pick something you’re confident and passionate about. I chose to speak about SEND in our subject; something close to my heart. A mentor once told me, “You only need to know one more thing than your audience.” (They also said I didn’t drink enough tea to be a teacher!)

4. Use Visual Planning Tools

You don’t need pages of notes. Visual tools like hexagonal thinking or a simple mind map can help structure your ideas.

5. Pause Before You Write

“When you have thoughts, just hold onto them. See where they take you, and as time passes, you will find out if you were right. Never decide right at the start if something is right or wrong.” (Hwang Bo-Reum)

Don’t rush from planning to writing. Take a day or two to reflect. Ask yourself: Will this deliver the message I want to share? That pause can save time and improve clarity.

6. Avoid “Death by PowerPoint”

Slides should support—not distract from—your message. Keep them simple, uncluttered, and easy to read. A powerful image or diagram often speaks louder than words.

7. Create a Memorable Hook

A short, punchy statement can engage your audience and make your message stick. Mine was:
“Autism is not an impairment – it is a superpower!”

8. Tell Stories

“Stories turn concepts into real-world possibilities.” Nancy Duarte
Stories build emotional connections and make your message memorable. Facts alone can be dry; stories bring them to life.

9. Use Your Networks

Don’t underestimate the value of your personal and professional networks. Share your ideas and drafts. Practice with colleagues or at staff meetings. The feedback you get will be extremely valuable and could earn you additional recognition and respect.

10. The Night Before: Rest, Don’t Rewrite

By now, you’ve rehearsed and refined your presentation. Resist the urge to tweak it the night before. Instead, relax and get a good night’s sleep.

11. Have a Backup Plan

Technology can fail so be ready. Speaking without slides can be liberating. Whether it’s a power cut or a missing cable, knowing you can still deliver your message is empowering.

12. Be Yourself

Don’t compare your style to others. Everyone presents differently. I chose to stand beside the lectern rather than behind it, it felt more open and aligned with my SEND values. The lectern felt like a barrier, and I wanted connection.

Enjoy the Experience!

The sense of achievement afterwards is incredible. You never know what opportunities might follow.

When I first began designing a new Religious Studies curriculum across our 28 secondary schools, I knew it would be ambitious but I most certainly didn’t realise how much I would learn along the way. As Trust Strategic Lead for Religious Studies (RS) and Personal Development, I work with schools where RS is often taught by non-specialists and where, historically, it hasn’t always been a curriculum priority.

Where it all began

Until this academic year, RS was taught alongside Citizenship and PSHE under the banner of ‘Life’. The model was well-intentioned but often disjointed, rushed and poorly implemented. Then came a turning point: as part of an extension to the school day, we were given something we had wanted for what seems like forever…Dedicated Curriculum Time.

From September this academic year, every Key Stage 3 student in 20 of our schools is receiving one hour a week of RS, with the remaining 8 receiving this in either January 2026 or September 2026. This was a golden opportunity, but also a challenge: we needed a coherent, high-quality curriculum that could be delivered effectively across very different school contexts, mostly by non-specialists, and it needed to be developed at a significant pace.

Stage one: building the foundations

I began by reviewing the locally agreed syllabuses from our 13 local authorities. I wanted to identify the common ground; the shared themes, aims, and approaches that could underpin our Trust curriculum. It quickly became apparent how much consistency already existed. Many syllabuses had been written or influenced by the same experts and organisations, meaning we were, in effect, edging towards a national curriculum for RE by default. Although our schools didn’t have the curriculum time to follow these, it was useful to see what the intended model was for each Local Authority.

Using these common threads, I drafted a Trust-wide curriculum specification; a document setting out what our students should study, understand, and be able to do by the end of Key Stage 3. This draft was shared with a small group of RS teachers across the Trust, who were asked to outline a three-year plan which would fulfil its demands.

Out of curiosity (and practicality), I also ran the same specification through a generative artificial intelligence tool, asking it to generate a range of possible units that would meet our aims. There were far too many to use — but that was the point. When the teachers later did the same exercise using the AI-generated unit ideas, their models were remarkably similar to both their original plans and my own initial proposal. That gave me confidence that the foundation was sound.

Stage two: defining the core

From there, I identified our core concepts and curriculum aims, drawing heavily on:

  • The Ofsted Research Review and its distinction between substantive, disciplinary, and personal knowledge
  • The REC Handbook for Religion and Worldviews

Initially, I wanted to offer schools plenty of flexibility. Each unit would contain core lessons that every student would complete, alongside optional lessons that teachers could select based on their school’s needs, interests, or specialisms. The idea was that all students would receive a common “diet” of RS knowledge, while teachers retained some autonomy.

However, this model quickly proved unsustainable. Some units contained up to 15 lessons, which simply wasn’t realistic to plan and would lead to too many variables when implemented. Another challenge was that, because our new timetable allowed RS to be taught across all of Key Stage 3 simultaneously, teachers would be teaching the new Year 7–9 units at once; without students having completed the prior knowledge the curriculum assumed. And in conjunction with this, we have been planning all 3 year groups simultaneously.

In response, I scaled the plan back. Every unit now has a maximum of eight lessons; enough to explore depth and variety, but manageable for planning and teaching. Optional elements remain, but within realistic limits.

We also had to make pragmatic decisions about our Dharmic faith units. Ideally, schools would have a choice between Hindu, Buddhist, or Sikh traditions for 2 units — but this would triple the planning load. For this first implementation, we’ve chosen to focus on Hindu for the first unit and Buddhist traditions for the second, with an aspiration to broaden in the future.

Lessons learned along the way

1. Start with purpose, not content

It’s easy to begin curriculum writing with lists of topics, and in all honesty – the things you find most interesting, but the most valuable question is: What should students understand about religion and worldviews and what skills should they develop by the end?

Defining purpose first gives every later decision direction. It helps filter what truly matters from what merely fills space.

2. Less really is more

This phrase has become something of a mantra. Overloading the curriculum helps no one…not students, not teachers, and not long-term understanding. Keeping the number of lessons tight has allowed us to focus on quality over quantity.

You will face resistance, especially from those who equate breadth with rigour, those who want to teach the things they have always taught, those who want to go back to learning a list of facts by rote. Stick to your vision and moral purpose. A deep understanding of fewer ideas is more powerful than a shallow tour of everything.

3. Write for non-specialists

This was one aspect I have been almost militant about. In a Trust where many RS teachers are non-specialists, every detail has to be clear, purposeful, and accessible.

Lesson plans are simple and direct: “Do this, then that.” But each includes a knowledge box outlining exactly what students must know by the end of the lesson. There are teacher guides with key knowledge, extra reading, misconceptions, and context for where each lesson fits within the wider scheme.

Resources also come with tiered reading materials, usually at four levels (e.g., reading ages 10, 12, 14, and 16). This isn’t to match each text to individual students, but to allow teachers to choose what’s most appropriate for their group.

Finally, every resource is as inclusive as possible to support our most vulnerable students: pastel backgrounds, minimal icons, clear dual coding, and accessible fonts. These are simple changes but that are, “harmful to no one, essential for a few.”

4. Listen to feedback but know which feedback matters

Feedback is invaluable, but not all of it is meaningful. Learning to tell the difference is crucial. Comments like “I’m not sure when to hand out the worksheet” aren’t the same as “The pitch of Year 9 feels too high.”

Equally, some colleagues will always resist perceived “top-down” curriculum models. Respond politely and professionally, but don’t let negativity derail progress. If the plan is pedagogically sound, it deserves the chance to prove itself.

5. Keep refining

Curriculum design is never “finished.” I’m continually reviewing lessons using a RAG system (red, amber, green) to track where further development is needed. Once this first academic year is complete and the resources are in place, I will begin the process of refining materials, tightening clarity, and responding to meaningful feedback.

Being open to iteration keeps the curriculum alive — and builds trust with those who teach it.

What’s changed and what’s next

It’s early days, but the impact is already clear. Many Heads of Department who once felt disheartened are now re-energised. Some are actively lobbying for GCSE RS to return as an option in Year 9 not because they suddenly found spare time, but because they finally have the tools and confidence to deliver their subject properly.

That, to me, is the most rewarding outcome of all. Curriculum isn’t just about documents and sequencing; it’s about giving teachers and students back their subject.

Next year, I’ll continue to gather staff and student feedback, refining as we go. But for now, I’m proud of what we’ve built…a curriculum that’s inclusive, practical, and purposeful; one that balances flexibility with consistency, and ambition with realism.

If I’ve learned anything from this process, it’s to stay humble, listen wisely, and accept that you’ll never please everyone. Curriculum design invites strong opinions and that’s no bad thing. It means people care. What matters most is keeping sight of the purpose: giving every student the chance to make sense of religion and worldviews in a way that’s meaningful, challenging, and fair.

As the calendar turns to January 2026, the new year offers a natural pause for reflection. In the fast-paced world of education, it is rare to stop and take stock, but it is necessary.

For us at Outwood Grange Academies Trust, this January marks a significant milestone in a strategy we accelerated in September 2025. It was a strategy designed not to change our direction, but to strengthen our resolve: explicitly placing Personal Development at the heart of our curriculum structure, with Religious Education (RE) acting as a critical lever in that work.

Reflecting on this last term, for us the verdict is clear: deepening this focus was the right move.

The timing has been validated by societal events. In a world where division is increasingly amplified, the importance of this work has never been more apparent. Looking forward, our resolution for 2026 is to pursue this vision with greater intent, ensuring we deliver it with the highest possible quality, depth, and equity.

The Foundation: Unapologetically Ambitious

As an organisation the foundation on which our Trust is built remains firm and strong. There must be no element of doubt in our message to our communities and our peers: achieving the highest possible educational outcomes is, and will always remain, our core purpose. We put ‘students first – raise standards and transform lives’. We serve communities often located in areas of high social disadvantage. In these contexts, we know that qualifications are not just certificates; they are keys. They unlock doors to higher education, apprenticeships, and careers that might otherwise remain bolted shut. Levelling up achievement is a critical social enabler. To dilute our focus on academic rigour would be a dereliction of duty. We remain unapologetically ambitious for every student’s exam results because those results change lives.

The Passport and the Traveller: Towards a Complete Education

However, September 2025 marked a decisive step in how we articulate a ‘complete’ education. We reaffirmed that while academic outcomes are the passport to the future, they do not dictate the kind of traveller our students will be.

We have elevated our focus on Personal Development because we believe that growing ‘great human beings’ is as fundamental as growing academic achievers. Our students are the leaders of tomorrow. Their attitudes, mindsets, and values will shape the future of our world—whether they are leading a country, a company, or a family.

If we want a society defined by dignity, understanding, and respect, we must actively invest in the formation of those virtues.

The Role of Religious Education

This brings us to the specific role of Religious Education. In our strategy to centre Personal Development, we identified RE not just as a subject to be covered, but as a vital component to be championed. We view RE through a dual lens: as a rigorous academic discipline in its own right, and as an essential engine for Personal Development.

 At this specific moment in history, RE provides the only dedicated academic space where students can rigorously explore the concepts of commonality and difference. It is the classroom where students learn to navigate the ‘other’. By strengthening the position of RE within our curriculum, we allow students to:

  • Build Intellectual Resilience (The Disciplinary Approach): We want our RE curriculums to be intellectually demanding and multidisciplinary. It is no longer enough to look at religion through a single lens. We are challenging students to engage with three distinct ways of knowing:
    • Theology: Engaging with texts, beliefs, and sources of wisdom to understand what people believe.
    • Philosophy: Wrestling with logic, ethics, and competing truth claims to understand how we think.
    • Social Sciences: Analysing the lived reality of religion and its impact on society and culture to understand how people live. By mastering these different disciplines, students do not just learn about religion; they learn how to evaluate evidence, construct arguments, and understand the complex human experience.
  • Explore Commonality & Difference (The Personal Development Component): This is where academic study meets personal growth. Students move beyond superficial ‘tolerance’ to a deep, respectful understanding of why people live, think, and believe differently. They grapple with moral dilemmas and define their own values in relation to the wider world.

Our 2026 Commitment: Depth, Equity, and Place

 As we move into 2026, our focus shifts to refining and embedding this enhanced provision. We are focusing on three key areas:

  1. Intellectual Diversity We are widening our lens beyond familiar examples to include genuine diversity across all three disciplines. This includes engaging with Eastern philosophers to challenge Western logic, studying the sociology of women in Sikhi traditions, and analysing the historical theology of ancient religions such as Atenism. This ensures the subject commands the academic respect it deserves while exposing students to the true breadth of human thought and behaviour.
  2. Absolute Equity Excellent provision must be systemic. Whether a child attends a small primary or a large urban secondary within our Trust, they have an equal entitlement to this deepened provision. We have scrutinised our resources to ensure inclusivity, ensuring that high-level learning, whether theological, philosophical, or sociological, is accessible to all. This is a matter of justice.
  3. The Power of Place Finally, we are embracing a nuanced understanding of community. While there is a global commonality our students need to understand, we also recognise the importance of place in their personal development. We are expanding our resource bank to include localised content. When we study what it means to practise Hindu traditions today, for example, we interchange generic imagery for the Mandir geographically closest to our students. By connecting the ‘big ideas’ of RE to the local context of the child, we make the learning stick and validate their lived experience.

We start 2026 with a determined spirit. The decision to further elevate Personal Development, with a robust, multidisciplinary RE curriculum as a central pillar, reflects our enduring belief that education is about the whole person. Our students will leave us with the qualifications to succeed, but they will also leave us with the wisdom to lead.

They will be the architects of a future where respect and understanding are the norm, not the exception. That is our purpose. That is our commitment.