Research Summary
The research arises out of the author’s wish to generate a deeper level of meaningful discussion between his RE pupils. The context is Roman Catholic RE: however, its guidelines include the need for respect for and dialogue with non-Roman Catholic pupils, many of whom are present and in daily contact with their Catholic peers. An action research experiment was designed and conducted, aimed at assessing increasing the amounts of cumulative talk and exploratory talk during dialogues between the two kinds of pupils. Cumulative talk involves building on what others say whilst exploratory talk involves engaging critically with it. A set of paired pupil dialogues on RE themes were set up. Certain teacher interventions (e.g. introducing the topic of religion and science) were found to improve the quality of talk. The findings should interest RE teachers, because they suggest that the quality of pupil discussion can improve when pupils have the opportunity for dialogues with those whose beliefs are different to theirs, also suggesting that some topics particularly suit this approach.
Researcher
Antony Luby
Research Institution
Aberdeen City Council Roman Catholic RE service
What is this about?
- How can quality talk be achieved, or improved, in the RE classroom?
- Specifically, how can levels of cumulative talk (building on what others say) and exploratory talk (engaging critically with it) be increased?
- What potential does inter-faith dialogue have, to promote critical reflection and deep learning?
What was done?
An action research experiment is reported. Paired dialogues between 20 Roman Catholic and non-Roman Catholic pupils were set up, exploring e.g. views on God or the beginning of the universe. The dialogues were analysed for levels of on-task, cumulative and exploratory talk, by both quantitative and qualitative analysis. The effects of teacher interventions (e.g. introducing new dialogue themes) were also measured.
Main findings and outputs
- Overall, a high level of on-task conversation was noted. In terms of the themes most likely to generate cumulative or exploratory talk, three were initially identified – religion and science, values and historical proof.
- Texts on religion and science and historical proof were now introduced into the dialogues. Do other dimensions exist? What evidence about Jesus’s life do we have? Cumulative talk now decreased, whilst exploratory talk increased.
- In a subsequent intervention, a videoclip on the Turin Shroud was provided as a stimulus for dialogue. Now, cumulative talk increased slightly whilst exploratory talk decreased.
- Despite these fluctuations, overall levels of cumulative and exploratory talk were satisfactory (55.8% of conversation time and 17.2% of conversation time respectively, at the close of the investigation) especially given exploratory talk’s reputation as hard to generate.
- A questionnaire administered following the dialogues found that a large majority of the pupils involved thought that the dialogical approach met the conditions of ‘deep learning’: seeing connections between ideas from different areas, overcoming difficulty, asking questions about what you hear or read, relating learning to previous learning, applying new ideas to real-life situations.
- Pupil quotations regarding the experience of dialogue:
‘A learning experience that enables you to see other people’s views and perspectives and ultimately how your beliefs compare.’
‘It’s very good for learning about the things that are difficult to get your head around; also it helps me accept others’ opinions and attitudes towards religion’.
Relevance to RE
The potential of dialogical approaches to motivate RE pupils and enrich discussion and understanding is well documented, and this study is a useful addition. RE teachers might learn from and adapt several of its features:
- Being prepared to look at gaps in one’s own practice, and to devise, try out and evaluate possible improvements. Initially, the author had been intrigued when dialogues between pupils with different views and backgrounds had ‘broken out’ accidentally, outside his lesson plan. Unexpected events can provide leads or hunches to follow.
- Trying out dialogical activities with pupils.
- Monitoring pupils’ levels of engagement and quality of conversation and looking for themes likely to engage or stretch them in future. In the author’s case, religion and science stimulated quality discussion and deep learning, perhaps because of the pupils’ opportunity to explore both big questions and difference.
Generalisability and potential limitations
During the conclusion to the article the author makes the following points:
‘Another limitation of this action research study is the small sample size of 20 pupils from one school. Therefore, any future study should increase the number of participants such that the analyses undertaken can have more robust statistical significance. Also, the sample should be across different types of secondary schools as the school used in this study can fairly be described as an academically high-attainment city comprehensive. Attention should be paid to schools of different types (e.g. faith, selective), with different locations (e.g. suburban, rural), and with different overall levels of attainment.’
Find out more
First-footing inter-faith dialogue, Educational Action Research 22.1 pages 57-71 (published online 11 December 2013), 10.1080/09650792.2013.854176
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09650792.2013.854176